New Publications and Initiatives in Byzantine Philosophy

There are a few new initiatives that will be of interest to network members and students interested in Byzantine Philosophy.

Be sure to check out network member Peter Adamson's podcast "The History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps". In addition to great podcasts on the history of philosophy from a global perspective, upcoming episodes will deal specifically with Byzantine Philosophy.

This podcast can be found here:  https://historyofphilosophy.net/

Here's a note from Peter:

Soon the podcast will be turning to Byzantine philosophy! Here is a tentative episode list, not including interviews. This series will be followed by a longer one on the Renaissance, all of it of course appearing in alternating weeks with Africana philosophy. Comments welcome!

Introduction to Byzantine Philosophy
Philosophy in Syriac and Armenian
Iconoclasm
John of Damascus
Byzantine Compendia
Michael Psellos
John Italos
Gender in Byzantine Thought
Anne Komnene and her Circle
Byzantine Histories
Byzantine Political Philosophy
The Proclus Controversy
Joane Petrizi
Bar Hebraeus
Intellectual Interchange with the Islamic World
Byzantine Manuscripts
Byzantine Natural Philosophy
Hesychasm
Plethon
Scholarius and Bessarion
Intellectual Interchange with Latin Christendom
The Orthodox Tradition Down to Today

In addition to this, be sure to check out these exciting new (special thanks to Ken Parry for bringing this to our attention):

A selection of papers in English by Linos Benakis have been published as Byzantine Philosophy: An introductory Approach (Staarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2017).
There is a new English translation and commentary on George Gemisto Plethon’s On Aristotle’s Departures from Plato, by Börje Bydén, Katerina Ierodiakonou and others in Börje Bydén and Christina Thomsen Thörnqvist, eds. The Aristotelian Tradition: Aristotle’s Works on Logic and Metaphysics and Their Reception in the Middle Ages. Papers in Mediaeval Studies, 28 (Turnhout: Brepols, 2017). The first complete translation in English but without a commentary was by C. M. Woodhouse, George Gemistos Plethon: The Last of the Hellenes (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986). 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Presence of Aristotle in Byzantine Theology

Image
With the kind permission of Professor David Bradshaw, below is an excerpt from his chapter, “The Presence of Aristotle in Byzantine Theology” in The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium , edited by Anthony Kaldellis & Niketas Siniossoglou (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017). Any attempt to survey the place of Aristotle within Byzantine theology must begin by recognizing that the category of “Byzantine theology” is itself a modern construction. The Byzantines did not think of themselves as Byzantines, but as Romans. This fact is not merely a matter of nomenclature, but a reminder of their strong sense of continuity with the classical and early Christian past. As regards theology, in particular, the Byzantines saw no sharp line dividing their own times from the foundational era of Christianity. Although they recognized the authority of the Church Fathers, they did not think in terms of a closed and completed “age of the Fathers.”[1] The holy and God-bearing Fathers
Read more

Historical Perspectives on Defining Byzantine Philosophy

Image
On 6 March 2020, scholars will gather at Macquarie University for a promising Workshop: Historical Perspectives on Defining Byzantine Philosophy. The Workshop is convened by Dr Ken Parry and Dr Eva Anagnostou-Laoutides. Below are the abstracts of the presentations. 1. Vassilis Adrahtas, The relationship between theology and philosophy in the work of John Damascene and its bearing on the question of Byzantine philosophy One of the problems that still persist with regards to the definition of Byzantine philosophy refers to the distinction between theology and philosophy and whether such a distinction is possible in the case of the history of ideas of Byzantium. This problem, however, is articulated in a rather simplistic way, insofar as it poses – anachronistically, I would dare say – theology and philosophy as two totally different fields of reference. But Byzantine thinkers seem to have opted for quite an alternative perspective: a perspective of co-inherence.   If Byzantine phil
Read more

Philosophy—A Preparation for Death?

The things that are painful for you are truly painful for us, too. For we make common property of all that belongs to friends, whether good or otherwise—this, surely, is the definition of friendship. Still, if we must philosophize a little about these things and discuss with you what seems right (and surely we must, as the law of friendship demands!), then I do not wish—I do not suppose it is a good thing—that you, Philagrius, a person unusually well schooled in the things of God, should experience the same feelings as ordinary people, or succumb to the weakness that affects your body, or that you should lament over your suffering as something incurable. You must find in your vulnerability a place to philosophize, and purify your mind now more than ever, and show yourself stronger than the things that hold you in check, and consider this illness a profitable training—namely, to look down on the body and bodily things, and on all that is fleeting and disturbing and passing away, and so
Read more