The Mystical as Political


An excerpt from Professor Aristotle Papanikolaou’s The Mystical as Political: Democracy and Non-Radical Orthodoxy (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2012), 13, 17, 20.

It is quite a remarkable fact that in the history of theology in the Christian East, there exists a core and guiding principle that is never challenged within the movement of the tradition: the principle of divine-human communion. This principle may sometimes be ignored, or often under-emphasized, but there are always trajectories within the tradition at any given moment in history that keeps its memory alive. Divine-human communion, or theosis, sparks the theological imagination of Orthodox Christians, and the influence of this principle is visible in writings related to questions of political theology […] The first signs of a distinctively “Orthodox” political theology, one that would wield considerable influence on what would become the Orthodox Church even beyond the definitive fall of the Byzantine Empire in 1453, are seen in the writings of Eusebius of Caesarea (260–340) […] for Eusebius, the Christian emperor is an image of the sovereignty of the Word insofar as this sovereignty is directed toward the collective, while the bishops image the Word insofar as their own influence is directed to the individual soul. This dual imagining of the Word was expressed liturgically in the Church of Agia Sophia, with the emperor’s throne given a prominent place in front and to the right of the altar. The emperor as image of the Word’s sovereignty depends on his commitment to the Christian truth because only then can the emperor hope to form “his soul to royal virtues according to the standard of that celestial kingdom.” In what reads like a response to Plato’s understanding of the philosopher king, Eusebius describes Constantine as a: 
Victor in truth, who has gained the victory over those passions which overmaster the rest of men, whose character is formed after the divine original of the supreme sovereign and whose mind reflects as in a mirror the radiance of his virtues. Hence is our emperor perfect in discretion, in goodness, in justice, in courage, in piety, in devotion to God; he truly and only is a philosopher, since he knows himself, and is fully aware that supplies of every blessing are showered on him from a course quite external to himself, even from heaven itself.
The fact that Constantine was not all that Eusebius made him out to be does not detract from Eusebius’s sacramental vision of the role of the emperor—the true philosopher king—since he is devoted to the truth of the divine Word, and only through the knowledge of such truth can the emperor embody the royal virtues that allow him to mediate the sovereignty of the Word to the empire. This particular role of the emperor, a kind of sacerdotal role that facilitates the presence of the divine Word throughout the empire—further guaranteeing the unity and peace of the empire—could be the reason why Eusebius rejects democracy as “anarchy and disorder,” and argues that “monarchy far transcends every other constitution and form of government.” Democracy reflects more the disorder of the pagan gods than the unity of truth of the Word of God.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Presence of Aristotle in Byzantine Theology

Image
With the kind permission of Professor David Bradshaw, below is an excerpt from his chapter, “The Presence of Aristotle in Byzantine Theology” in The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium , edited by Anthony Kaldellis & Niketas Siniossoglou (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017). Any attempt to survey the place of Aristotle within Byzantine theology must begin by recognizing that the category of “Byzantine theology” is itself a modern construction. The Byzantines did not think of themselves as Byzantines, but as Romans. This fact is not merely a matter of nomenclature, but a reminder of their strong sense of continuity with the classical and early Christian past. As regards theology, in particular, the Byzantines saw no sharp line dividing their own times from the foundational era of Christianity. Although they recognized the authority of the Church Fathers, they did not think in terms of a closed and completed “age of the Fathers.”[1] The holy and God-bearing Fathers
Read more

Pythagoras Byzantinus

Image
The Pythagoras Byzantinus research project aims to fill an important gap in our knowledge and understanding of the history and forms of reception of Pythagoras and Pythagoreanism in Middle and Late Byzantium, a gap that has been highlighted in the international academic bibliography. In contrast to other Medieval traditions (Latin, Arabic, Syriac and Jewish), the reception of Pythagoras and Pythagoreanism in Byzantium has not yet been studied systematically. In the relevant bibliography, there are only sporadic or fragmentary references to Pythagorean resonances in Middle and Late Byzantine texts, while the number of articles dealing with it is still extremely limited. At the same time, eminent contemporary historians of philosophy have repeatedly stressed the need to explore this rather understudied thematic field. In order to fill this existing research gap and improve our understanding of the reception of Pythagoras and Pythagoreanism in Middle and Late Byzantium, this project will
Read more

Sourcebook of Byzantine Philosophy

Image
An exciting new project known as the Sourcebook of Byzantine Philosophy (SBPh) is underway, led by Katerina Ierodiakonou, Pantelis Golitsis, Ioannis Papachristou and Dafni Argyri. According to the SBPh team, Byzantine philosophy is still overlooked by the history of philosophy. For Byzantine philosophy to be properly studied and appreciated, a SBPh, which collects the key texts of Byzantine thinkers in an accessible edition, is essential. The SBPh will contain selected Byzantine philosophical texts in the original and in English translation, and will place these texts in their historical context. Selected texts will cover the period from the 8th century to the 15th century, exploring the areas of logic, theory of knowledge, metaphysics, natural philosophy, psychology, ethics and politics. To learn more about the project, peruse the SBPh website: https://byphil.gr/ 
Read more